Primary Care in Management of Pulmonary Embolism in Prolonged Recumbences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54293/smhj.v3i3.81Keywords:
Pulmonary Embolism, Primary Care, Out-Patient, Anticoagulants, Management Remove Pulmonary Embolism, managementAbstract
A frequent and possibly fatal kind of venous thromboembolic illness is pulmonary embolism (PE). It is a significant issue for public health. A typical diagnosis as a primary care in an emergency room is pulmonary embolism (PE). Additionally, it makes up a sizable portion of the patients admitted to hospital wards. In selected low-risk individuals with acute PE, there is mounting evidence that outpatient therapy, or treatment without hospitalization, is practical, safe, and efficient. PE patients may be risk-classified and given an early release from the emergency department. As a result, there are more hospital beds available for other patients, which lowers treatment expenses for the healthcare system. There is growing support for the outpatient care of low-risk, hemo-dynamically stable patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE). There is assistance in identifying patients who are eligible for outpatient (primary) care. This move has been made easier by the accessibility and simplicity of direct oral anticoagulants. Acute PE is currently mostly treated with direct, non-vitamin K-dependent oral anticoagulants. In comparison to vitamin K antagonists, they have been demonstrated to simplify initial and prolonged anticoagulation regimes while lowering the risk of bleeding. In this consensus practice document, we present a thorough analysis of primary care in the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of acute PE.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Saudi Medical Horizons Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.